A thermodynamic study of aqueous acetonitrile: excess chemical potentials, partial molar enthalpies, entropies and volumes, and fluctuations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We measured vapour pressures of aqueous acetonitrile (abbreviated as ACN) at 6, 20, and 37°C, from which excess chemical potentials of ACN (µ EACN) were calculated. We also determined excess partial molar enthalpies of ACN (H EACN) at 6, 20, 30, 37, and 45°C. From these data, excess partial molar entropies of ACN (S EACN) were calculated at 6, 20, and 37°C. Using density data by Benson's group, excess partial molar volumes of ACN (V EACN) were evaluated. The response function data by the same group were also used to evaluate amplitude and wavelength of mean-square fluctuations in terms of volume, entropy, and cross between volume and entropy. All the above quantities and their dependence on the mol fraction of solute, i.e., the effect of additional solute on the above quantities were used to study the effect of acetonitrile on the molecular organization of H2O. It was found that acetonitrile works as a stronger structure-making solute than methanol. Rather its effect on H2O is about the same as that of propan-1-ol.Key words: aqueous acetonitrile, interaction functions, fluctuations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".