MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236436117 · doi:10.2147/ppa.s284511

<p>The Healthy Kids Initiative: Results from the First 2000 Participants</p>

2020· article· en· W4236436117 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Lemstra, Marla Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenuePatient Preference and Adherence · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMoodAerobic exerciseSocioeconomic statusQuality of life (healthcare)GerontologyCardiovascular fitnessPhysical therapyPhysical fitnessClinical psychologyPopulationNursingEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The comprehensive and free Healthy Kids Initiative (HKI) was developed with key features including social support, family support, and cognitive behavior education in order to promote program completion and improve health outcomes among youth. The first objective was to determine program completion rates and independent risk indicators for non-completion. The second objective was to determine the 12-week impact of the Healthy Kids Initiative on aerobic fitness, depressed mood and health-related quality of life. Patients and Methods: Obese youth (ages 10– 17) were referred to a community-based, multidisciplinary, free program by their doctor or pediatrician. Each participant was requested to attend the program with a “buddy” and complete three social support contracts with family and friends to support their behavioral modifications. The program duration was 12 weeks with physical activity, dietary, and cognitive behavior education sessions. Those who completed the program, and those who did not, were compared across socioeconomic variables, age, gender, depressed mood and aerobic fitness. Results: Across five cohorts, 1789 of 1995 youth completed the program (89.7% completion rate). Five referred youth never started. Independent risk indicators associated with non-completion included older age (OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.26– 4.17; p< 0.001), mother with a non-professional occupation (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.22– 2.78; p=0.004), and living in a low-income neighborhood (OR 9.37, 95% CI 5.61– 15.65; p< 0.001). There were significant improvements from baseline for aerobic fitness (mCAFT score 35.84 to 55.72 mL × kg − 1 × min − 1 ; p< 0.001), depressed mood (mean CES-D 12 score 21.47 to 17.40; p< 0.001), and health-related quality of life (mean SF-12 score 23.4 to 33.8; p< 0.001). Conclusion: The HKI program had high completion rates and early success in improving outcomes. Knowing the independent risk indicators for non-completion will allow for program revision to help at-risk participants complete the program. Keywords: adolescent, community-based, obese, aerobic fitness, adherence, physical activity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePatient Preference and AdherenceSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207