Design and Specification Compilation of a Modularized Prefabricated High-rise Steel Frame Structure with Inclined Braces Part II: Elastic-plastic analysis and Joint Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modularized prefabricated steel structure has some obvious advantages, such as fast construction, industrial-scale production and environment-friendliness. Although it has been used for low-rise buildings, its applications in high-rise buildings are quite less. The elastic-plastic time-history analysis under rare earthquake conditions is performed on a 30-floor building. The changing law of the base shear force, the story drift angle, the stress, the damage characteristics, etc. are studied. According to the theoretical analysis, the finite element simulation and the model test, the design methods and the relevant formulas regarding the elastic and elastic-plastic properties of the beam-column connection joints, the column flange joints and the inclined brace joints are proposed in this paper. The control parameters for the structural design are also discussed. This paper provides an important reference for the research and design of the same type of modularized prefabricated high-rise steel structures, and the design method has been compiled into design specification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".