Further Investigation of the Influence of Real-World Blade Profile Variation on the Aerodynamic Performance of Transonic Nozzle Guide Vanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of aerodynamic consequences of variations in airfoil profile. An analysis of new and repaired airfoils was used to synthesize profiles representative of specific repair types. Five variations of a reference new low pressure turbine vane were obtained by changing the characteristic parameters of trailing-edge tweaking and laminate-repair methods used to refurbish turbine vanes. Flow visualization of shock structure and total pressure measurements were made by experimentation in a cascade rig and by calculations through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The performance of the modified profiles was compared with that of the reference new vane. The total pressure losses increased when the profile was bent at the trailing edge towards the pressure side. The losses for synthesized laminate repair profiles increased with an increase in the thickness of laminate repair. The numerical results were used to supplement experimental results in cases where the experimental conditions were not representative of typical design operating conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".