MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236689006 · doi:10.1002/9781118430873.est0773

<scp>T</scp>arde,<scp>G</scp>abriel

2017· other· en· W4236689006 on OpenAlexaff
David Toews

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmile Durkheim and Sociology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationUniversalizationSociologyEpistemologyAnthropocentrismPhilosophyEnvironmental ethicsPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gabriel Tarde (1843–1904) was a founder of sociology. Attentive to differences and repetitions as revealed in statistics, sociology was to represent, in his view, a higher evolution and universalization of scientific method that would finally expel ontologized conceptions of community and reject what Bergson, following Tarde, would later term “intellectualism”: the tendency to build analysis on reifications. In the end, Tarde's vision was denied by colleagues who asserted that the moral evolution of human social life elevates human relations into a special category of relations requiring sociology to be limited to a compartmentalized discipline. Beginning in 1999, the first wave of revival and republication initially pressed Tarde into the service of Deleuzian and Latourian remonstrations against anthropocentrism and neo‐Kantianism. Recently, a second wave characterized by the operationalization of Tarde's twenty‐first‐century reception, resonating with views of society as fluid and networked, has produced new empirical work based on Tarde's thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social TheorySame topicEmile Durkheim and SociologyFrench-language works237,207