MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peer Review #2 of "Weekend effect in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis (v0.1)"

2018· review· en· W4236865960 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
YY Chuah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHospital Admissions and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisUpper gastrointestinal bleedingMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim.To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the weekend effect on the mortality of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).Methods.The review protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42017073313) and was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.We conducted a search of the PUBMED, COCHRANE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases from inception to August 2017.All observational studies comparing mortality between UGIB patients with weekend versus weekday admissions were included.Articles that were published only in abstract form or not published in a peerreviewed journal were excluded.The quality of articles was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.We pooled results from the articles using random-effect models.Heterogeneity was evaluated by the chisquare-based Q-test and I 2 test.To address heterogeneity, we performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses.Potential publication bias was assessed via funnel plot. Results.Eighteen observational cohort studies involving 1,232,083 study patients were included.Weekend admission was associated with significantly higher 30-day or in-hospital mortality in all studies (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07 -1.17, P < 0.00001).Increased in-hospital mortality was also associated with weekend admission (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08 -1.17, P < 0.00001).No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients admitted with variceal bleeding during the weekend or on weekdays (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.91 -1.08, P = 0.82); however, weekend admission was associated with a 15% increase in in-hospital mortality for patients with non-variceal bleeding (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09 -1.21, P < 0.00001).The time to endoscopy for weekday admission was significantly less than that obtained for weekend admission (MD = -2.50,95% CI: -4.08 --0.92,P = 0.002). Conclusions.The weekend effect is associated with increased mortality of UGIB patients, particularly in non-variceal bleeding.The timing of endoscopic intervention might be a factor that influences mortality of UGIB patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHospital Admissions and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207