Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2013), "Studies in Symbolic Interaction", Denzin, N.K. (Ed.) 40th Anniversary of Studies in Symbolic Interaction (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 40), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, p. iii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-2396(2013)0000040027 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters 40th Anniversary of Studies in Symbolic Interaction Studies in Symbolic Interaction Studies in Symbolic Interaction Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction Ethnographic Practice(s) and Symbolic Interaction: Work from the Contemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines Hui Hypertextual Self-Scapes: Crossing the Barriers of the Skin The Contact Sheet: Combining Evocative and Analytic Modes into Visual Autoethnography of the Moment Movement-Initiated Writing in Dance Ethnography Transgressing Boundaries of Private and Public: Auto-Ethnography and Intercultural Funerals An Autoethnography of Queer Transmasculine Femme Incoherence and the Ethics of Trans Research Going “Slowly Slowly”: An Ethnographic Engagement with Resettled Sudanese Men Symbolic Interactionism in Safety Communication in the Workplace Boys’ Visual Representations and Interpretations of Physical Education Ethnographic Fieldwork as Embodied Material Practice: Reflections from Theory and the Field To the Field, and Back… New Religious Movements as Avenues for Self-Change and the Development of Increased Emotional Connectedness The Contributions of the California Sociologies to the Diversity and Development of Symbolic Interaction Terrorism and the National Security University: Public Order Redux Social Media and the 2011 Vancouver Riot Navigating the Terrain of Medical Diagnosis and Treatment: Patient Decision Making and Uncertainty Making Mediation Work: A Sociological View of Human Conflict Do Animals have Selves? We’ll Always have the Self The Selves of other Animals: Reconsidering Mead in Light of Multidisciplinary Evidence About the Authors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".