Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Reviewed in this article: Abu‐Lughod, Lila. 2004. Dramas of nationhood. The politics of television in Egypt. Bauman, Richard. 2004. A world of others’words. Cross‐cultural perspectives on intertextuality. Beckerman, Wilfred. 2002. A poverty of reason. Sustainable development and economic growth. Byron, Reginald (ed.). 2003. Retrenchment and regeneration in rural Newfoundland. Carsten, Janet. 2004. After kinship. De Boeck, Filip, and Marie Françoise Plissart. 2004. Kinshasa. Tales of the invisible city. Dennis, Philip A. 2004. The Miskitu people of Awastara. Gottlieb, Alma. 2004. The afterlife is where we come from. The culture of infancy in West Africa. Howes, David (ed.). 2005. The empire of the senses. The sensual culture reader. Kohl, Karl‐Heinz. 2003. Die Macht der Dinge. Geschichte und Theorie sakraler Objekte. Kürti, László. 2002. Youth and the state in Hungary. Capitalism, communism and class. Kushner, Tony. 2004. We Europeans? Mass Observation,‘race’and British identity in the twentieth century. Liechty, Mark. 2002. Suitably modern. Making middle‐class culture in a new consumer society. Machado‐Borges, Thaïs. 2003. Only for you! Brazilians and the telenovela flow. Meskell, Lynn. 2002. Private life in New Kingdom Egypt. Pun, Ngai. 2005. Made in China. Women factory workers in a global workplace. Saugestad, Sidsel. 2001. The inconvenient indigenous. Remote area development in Botswana, donor assistance and the First People of the Kalahari. Spencer, Paul. 2004. The Maasai of Matapato. A study of rituals of rebellion. Vázquez León, Luis. 2003. El Leviatá n arqueoló gico. Anthropoloía de una tradició n científica en México. Warren, Kay B., and Jean E. Jackson (eds). 2002. Indigenous movements, self‐representation and the state in Latin America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".