Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mannerism or maniera is a name given to a style and period in 16th-century Italian art, chronologically positioned between the High Renaissance and the Baroque periods. The term was first applied to painting, then later to sculpture and architecture. Mannerism remains the subject of much scholarly debate centering on questions of the precise date parameters for the style, its primary formal characteristics, its application, and meaning. Nevertheless, there is a general agreement that Mannerism presented a clear departure from High Renaissance classicism, formulated by a younger generation of artists who professionally matured in the wake of the death of Raphael in 1520. Although the Mannerists took the High Renaissance style as their point of departure, the Mannerist style was diametrically opposed to the rational, harmonious, and decorous ideals of High Renaissance classicism. Mannerism, while primarily an Italian phenomenon, spread throughout northern Europe partially as a result of the presence of Italian artists at the court of François I at Fontainebleau and the proliferation and dissemination of Mannerist engravings. In the north, Mannerism flourished particularly at aristocratic and princely courts, such as the court of the King of France, François I at Fontainebleau and the court of Emperor Rudolf II in Prague. The expansion of Mannerism as a phenomenon beyond Italy has also led to the questionable extension of its application to literature and music.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".