MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237316502 · doi:10.1139/f00-161

Effects of freshwater hyperoxia and hypercapnia and their influences on subsequent seawater transfer in Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) smolts

2000· article· en· W4237316502 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
C.J. Brauner, Michel Seidelin, Steffen S. Madsen, Frank B. Jensen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHyperoxiaHypercapniaSalmoSmoltificationAnimal scienceChemistryRespiratory systemPlasma osmolalitySeawaterBiologyFisheryOxygenSalmonidaeEcologyAnatomyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) presmolts, smolts, and postsmolts compensate for a respiratory acidosis associated with 96 h of exposure to hyperoxia (100% O2; hO2), hypercapnia (2% CO2and 98% air; hCO2), and combined hO2/hCO2in freshwater (FW) by increasing strong ion difference, predominantly through a reduction in plasma [Cl-] (presumably via branchial Cl-/HCO3-exchange). In smolts, compensation during hO2or hCO2occurred within 24 h, whereas that in combined hO2/hCO2was much slower, resulting in 33% mortality by 96 h. FW hO2and combined hO2/hCO2appeared to impair gill function, likely through oxidative cell damage. This resulted in reduced hypoosmoregulatory ability following subsequent transfer to seawater (SW), as indicated by changes in plasma ion levels, osmolality, and muscle water content, resulting in considerable mortalities. Interestingly, FW hCO2appeared to enhance hypoosmoregulatory ability during subsequent SW transfer. Smolts are often transported from FW to a subsequent SW release site, and these data indicate that care should be taken to minimize the degree of hyperoxia experienced by the smolts. Hypercapnia, which results from metabolic CO2production and inadequate water aeration, does not impair SW transfer, provided it does not occur in conjunction with hyperoxia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207