Bibliographic record
Abstract
ters. The diagnosis of CHB infection was made on the basis of biochemical, serological and histological data, when available. Seventy and six percent of the patients were nucleos(t)ide nave. Virological response was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA level (<200 copy/ml) by COBAS Taqman (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Safety issue was analyzed based on renal function. Results: Median age was 47.0 years. At baseline, 32% of the patients were HBeAg positive, 38% had cirrhosis, 201 patients were treated with ETV and 310 were treated with TDF based on the discretion of investigators. There were no significant differences in terms of the baseline characteristics observed between two treatment groups except initial higher serum AST (p=0.001), GGT (p=0.007) and HBV DNA levels (p=0.001) in ETV treatment group. Overall virological response rates in ETV and TDF treatment groups were 60% vs 58% (p>0.05), 81% vs 70% (p=0.017), 84% vs 77% (p>0.05) and 86% vs 84% (p>0.05) at 24, 48, 72 and 96 weeks, respectively. In NUC-nave group, response rates were 59% vs 59% (p>0.05), 81% vs 72% (p=0.042), 84% vs 78% (p>0.05) and 86% vs 85% (p>0.05) at 24, 48, 72 and 96 weeks, respectively. With logistic regression analysis, after adjusted age and gender, ETV treatment (p=0.039, OR: 1.72) and HBeAg negativity (p=<0.001, OR: 3.69) were predictive factors for undetectable HBV DNA at week 48. Primary non response (< 1 log10 decrease) at week 24 was observed in 2% (2 ETV, 7 TDF) and partial virological response at week 48 in 25% of the patients (19% ETV vs 29% TDF, p=0.011). HBeAg loss was achieved in 23 of HBeAg positive patients. The cumulative probability of HBeAg loss was 10.9% and 20.4% at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. HBsAg loss was achieved in 2 patients. Hepatocellular carcinoma developed in 10 cirrhotic patients. Both treatments were well tolerated, no serious adverse event was observed. From baseline to the end of the 96 weeks, no significant difference in terms of the serum creatinine levels was observed between two treatment groups (median 0.87 mg/dL vs 0.87 mg/dL in ETV group and 0.82 mg/dL vs 0.84 mg/dL in TDF group (p>0.05). Conclusions: This study confirms that ETV and TDF suppressed HBV viral replication in CHB patients with/without cirrhosis in clinical practice. Both drugs are safe and tolerable in such patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".