MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237349179 · doi:10.1080/07060660009500495

Abstracts, British Columbia Regional Meeting, The Canadian Phytopathological Society, 1999

2000· article· en· W4237349179 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsGeographyLibrary sciencePhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several dominant avirulence genes from the smut fungus, Ustilago hordei, have been identified on differential cultivars of barley.We analyzed 50 progeny segregating for three unlinked Avr genes, VI, V2, and V6.Two RAPD markers, loosely linked to VI at 7 and 2 map units, have been found by bulk segregant analysis.One AFLP marker, linked to the recessive allele vl, was found physically closer but still at 2 cM distance.A cosmid carrying this AFLP marker harbored a nearby probe, common to both parents, that could not detect recombinants.The area is embedded in a repetitive, difficult-to-clone DNA region.A BAC-library representing the avirulent parent yielded several overlapping clones.Genomic walking identified probes that, upon recombinational analysis, delimited VI on an approximately 40-kb region.Pathogenicity tests with subclones are underway.Only germinating seedlings can be inoculated with mated strains and success rates during compatible interactions vary from several to 80%.Reliable scoring is possible only at heading after 8 weeks.The incompatible interaction does not show any visible, macroscopic symptoms such as lesions or HR.We have also found through phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences and AFLP fingerprint comparisons, that the small grain-infecting smuts which include U. hordei, consist of a closely related group of organisms pathogenic on related hosts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207