MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237505044 · doi:10.1177/070674370905400514

Errata

2009· article· en· W4237505044 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerationPsychologyPsychiatryMedicineSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ulberg R, Johansson P, Marble A, et al. Patient sex as moderator of effects of transference interpretation in a randomized controlled study of dynamic psychotherapy. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(2)78–86. It has come to the authors' attention that their article included an error on page 84, regarding Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 was repeated and Figure 2 was omitted. We are reprinting the missing Figure 2. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry regrets the error and any inconvenience it might have caused. [Figure: see text] GAF: Reliable change = 5.8, functional range > 71 Healy D. Are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors a risk factor for adolescent suicide? Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(2):69–71. The author has found errors in his In Debate article. The main error appears in Table 2 on page 70, under “All antidepressants” in the “Suicides” column. The number corresponding to “25 to 64” years of age, incorrectly reported as 6, should be 1. As a result, the “Total” should be changed from 11 to 6. The increase in relative risk reported in the text of the article, right column, line 24, incorrectly reported as “3.09-fold (95% CI 0.68 to 13.9)”, should be replaced with “1.69-fold”. However, in comparing the data in the 2 tables, it is clear that Table 1 indicates a 5-fold higher rate of deaths by suicide than Table 2. According to the author, this can be explained by underreporting to the US Food and Drug Administration, as reflected in Table 2, but also to the Medicine's Agency in the United Kingdom, as shown in Table 1. For instance, the true number of deaths by suicide from placebo controlled trials of paroxetine is 4, rather than the 1 reported to the regulators. This being the case, the relative risk of suicide is likely to be higher than that cited in the article. Therefore, these corrections do not change the substance of the author's argument. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry regrets the error and any inconvenience it might have caused. Jacques C, Ladouceur R, Fournier P-M, et coll. Effet du formulaire de consentement verbal sur le taux de participation à un sondage táláphonique. Rev can psychiatre. Vol 54, n o v 3, 2009, p. 190–198. Les auteurs ont constatá une erreur de l'ordre dans lequel le nom des troisième et quatrième auteurs apparaissait dans leur article. à la page 190, l'ordre fautif se lisait comme suit: «Patricia-Maude Fournier, MPs 3 ; Lucie Baillargeon, MD, MSc 4 ». Le bon ordre devrait ětre: Lucie Baillargeon, MD, MSc 3 ; Patricia-Maude Fournier, MPs 4 . à la page 198, l'ordre fautif se lisait comme suit: « 3 Professionelle de recherche, Centre quábácois d'excellence pour la právention et le traitement du jeu, ácole de psychologie, Universitá Laval, Quábec, Quábec. 4 Professeure titulaire de clinique, Dápartement de mádecine familiale, Universitá Laval, Quábec, Quábec». Le bon ordre devrait ětre: « 3 Professeure titulaire de clinique, Dápartement de mádecine familiale, Universitá Laval, Quábec, Quábec. 4 Professionelle de recherche, Centre quábácois d'excellence pour la právention et le traitement du jeu, ácole de psychologie, Universitá Laval, Quábec, Quábec». Par consáquent, les donnáes bibliographiques subsáquentes de cet article devraient se lire ainsi: Jacques C, Ladouceur R, Baillargeon L, et coll. Effet du formulaire de consentement verbal sur le taux de participation à un sondage táláphonique. Rev can psychiatre. Vol 54, n o 3, 2009, p. 190–198. La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie regrette cette erreur ainsi que tout inconvánient qu'elle a pu causer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.109
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.109
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3250.186

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicMental Health Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207