International Tax Planning: Subsection 15(2) and Partnerships in the Foreign Affiliate Context: Interpretive Arguments in the Absence of Legislative Amendments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of subsection 15(2) is to include in a shareholder's income amounts received from a corporation, either by the shareholder directly or by certain non-arm's-length persons and partnerships, in the guise of loans or other indebtedness. Specific exceptions exist for amounts owing by certain foreign affiliates, as well as for indebtedness between non-resident persons. Unfortunately, the broad language used in the relevant provisions can lead to anomalous results if those provisions are read and applied literally, without appropriate consideration being given to context and purpose. In particular, the manner in which partnerships have been incorporated into the shareholder loan rule can bring into question the potential application of subsection 15(2) in the foreign affiliate context. This article explores three examples of situations involving partnerships and foreign affiliates where a literal interpretation of the shareholder loan rule could lead to anomalous results. The article then outlines why it is reasonable to conclude, when considering the text, context, and purpose of subsection 15(2) and its related provisions, along with their legislative history, that the shareholder loan rule does not apply in the circumstances described in the examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".