Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lisa Rose Mar, Brokering Belonging: Chinese in Canada's Age of Exclusion, 1885–1945, reviewed by Timothy J. Stanley Gerald Friesen and Doug Owram, eds., Thinkers and Dreamers: Historical Essays in Honour or Carl Berger, reviewed by Donald Wright Douglas Francis, The Technological Imperative in Canada: An Intellectual History, reviewed by A.A. den Otter Damien-Claude Bélanger, Prejudice and Pride: Canadian Intellectuals Confront the United States, 1891–1945, reviewed by Christopher Pennington Alexis S. Troubetzkoy, Arctic Obsession: The Lure of the Far North, reviewed by Russell A. Potter Corinna A.W. Pike and Christopher McCreery, Canadian Symbols of Authority: Maces, Chains, and Rods of Office, reviewed by Kenneth Munro Rusty Bittermann, Sailor's Hope: The Life and Times of William Cooper, Agrarian Radical in an Age of Revolutions, reviewed by Sean Cadigan Barrington Walker, Race on Trial: Black Defendants in Ontario's Criminal Courts, 1858–1958, reviewed by Carla Marano Rhonda L. Hinther and Jim Mocharuk, eds., Re-imagining Ukrainian Canadians: History, Politics and Identity, reviewed by Dennis Molinaro Janet Guildford and Suzanne Morton, eds., Making Up the State: Women in 20th-Century Atlantic Canada, reviewed by Lisa Chilton Donica Belisle, Retail Nation: Department Stores and the Making of Modern Canada, reviewed by Estee Fresco Gregory P. Marchildon, ed., Agricultural History. Vol. 3 of The History of the Prairie West Series, reviewed by Marvin McInnis Charles Foran, Marvin Richard, reviewed by Russell Field Marcelle Cinq-Mars, La cuisine rationnée : Nourrir un peuple et une armée, 1914–1918, reviewed by Mourad Djebabla Bernd Horn, From Cold War to New Millennium: The History of the Royal Canadian Regiment, 1953–2008, reviewed by J.L. Granatstein Linda Ambrose, Matt Bray, Sara Burke, Donald Dennie, and Guy Gaudreau, Laurentian University: A History, edited by Matt Bray, reviewed by Michiel Horn
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.451 | 0.413 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".