MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237585291 · doi:10.1080/03066150412331333272

Book Reviews

2002· article· en· W4237585291 on OpenAlexafffund
Rob Albritton, Annette Aurélie Desmarais, Carrie Anne Furman, David Renton, Manish Thakur

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Peasant Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryYork University
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsPeasantCapitalismPoliticsSociologyPolitical scienceReligious studiesLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View, by Ellen Meiksins Wood. London: Verso, 2002. Pp.202. £13/$US22 (paperback). ISBN 1 85984 392 1. The World is Not for Sale, by José Bové and François Dufour (interviewed by Gilles Luneau and translated by Anna de Casparis). London and New York: Verso, 2001. Pp.206. $25 (hardback). ISBN 1 85984 614 9. Searching for Equity: Conceptions of Justice and Equity in Peasant Irrigation, edited by Rutgerd Boelens and Gloria Dávila. The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1998. $27 (hardback). ISBN 90 232 3385 9. Water Rights and Empowerment, edited by Rutgerd Boelens and Paul Hoogendam. The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 2002. $27.50 (hardback). ISBN 90 232 3764 1. Contesting Agriculture: Cooperativism and Privatization in the New Eastern Germany, by Hans C. Buechler and Judith-Maria Buechler. New York: State University of New York Press, 2002. $29.95 (paperback). ISBN 0 7914 5282 4. Champaran and Gandhi: Planters, Peasants and Gandhian Politics, by Jacques Pouchepadass. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp.277. Rs.475 /£14.99 (hardback). ISBN 0 19 564084 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5250.445

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Peasant StudiesSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207