MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

List of Contributors

2015· other· en· W4237629112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingSociologyLibrary scienceEmeraldManagementMedia studiesPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Working with Teaching Assistants and Other Support Staff for Inclusive Education (International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. vii-viii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620150000004021 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Paul A. Bartolo Faculty for Social Wellbeing, University of Malta, Msida, Malta Richard G. Berlach School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Glenda Cain School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Andrea M. Capizzi Department of Special Education, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Dianne Chambers School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Ritu V. Chopra The Paraprofessional Resource and Research (PAR2A) Center, School of Education and Human Development, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA Sharon Cramer Faculty of Exceptional Education, SUNY Buffalo State, Buffalo, NY, USA M. Alexandra Da Fonte Department of Special Education, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Lorraine Day School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Matthew Erickson Department of Special Education, College of Education, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA, USA Derek Hurrell School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Nancy L. Hutchinson Faculty of Education, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Jeremy Lynch Department of Special Education, College of Education, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA, USA Susan Main School of Education, Faculty of Education and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia Marianne Mangano Education Support Centre, Western Australia Dorotha “Mike” Monfore Department of Special Education, College of Education, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA, USA Jan Stivers School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA Denise J. Uitto Office of Academic Affairs, The University of Akron Wayne College, North Lawrence, OH, USA Michelle A. Villeneuve Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Book Chapters Working with Teaching Assistants and Other Support Staff for Inclusive Education International Perspectives on Inclusive Education Working with Teaching Assistants and Other Support Staff for Inclusive Education Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction Section I: Roles and Responsibilities The Changing Nature of the Roles of Support Staff New Metaphors for Teacher/Paraeducator Relationships The Role of Psychologists in Inclusive Settings Incorporating Therapy into the Regular Curriculum: Working Together with Occupational Therapists Section II: Participant Perspectives Paraeducator Voices on Inclusive Education Teacher Views on Working with Others to Promote Inclusion Support Staff and Indigenous Education Visiting Teachers’ Perceptions about Working with Teacher Assistants and Teachers Section III: Strategies in Practice Programming and Planning within a Multi-Faceted Classroom Working Collaboratively with Support Staff for Inclusive Education Assistive Technology and Teacher Assistants Training Programs for Teacher Assistants Reflective Practitioners: Teachers and Support Staff Reflecting Together About the Authors Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207