Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Working with Teaching Assistants and Other Support Staff for Inclusive Education (International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. vii-viii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620150000004021 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Paul A. Bartolo Faculty for Social Wellbeing, University of Malta, Msida, Malta Richard G. Berlach School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Glenda Cain School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Andrea M. Capizzi Department of Special Education, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Dianne Chambers School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Ritu V. Chopra The Paraprofessional Resource and Research (PAR2A) Center, School of Education and Human Development, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA Sharon Cramer Faculty of Exceptional Education, SUNY Buffalo State, Buffalo, NY, USA M. Alexandra Da Fonte Department of Special Education, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Lorraine Day School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Matthew Erickson Department of Special Education, College of Education, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA, USA Derek Hurrell School of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia Nancy L. Hutchinson Faculty of Education, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Jeremy Lynch Department of Special Education, College of Education, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA, USA Susan Main School of Education, Faculty of Education and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia Marianne Mangano Education Support Centre, Western Australia Dorotha “Mike” Monfore Department of Special Education, College of Education, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA, USA Jan Stivers School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA Denise J. Uitto Office of Academic Affairs, The University of Akron Wayne College, North Lawrence, OH, USA Michelle A. Villeneuve Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Book Chapters Working with Teaching Assistants and Other Support Staff for Inclusive Education International Perspectives on Inclusive Education Working with Teaching Assistants and Other Support Staff for Inclusive Education Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction Section I: Roles and Responsibilities The Changing Nature of the Roles of Support Staff New Metaphors for Teacher/Paraeducator Relationships The Role of Psychologists in Inclusive Settings Incorporating Therapy into the Regular Curriculum: Working Together with Occupational Therapists Section II: Participant Perspectives Paraeducator Voices on Inclusive Education Teacher Views on Working with Others to Promote Inclusion Support Staff and Indigenous Education Visiting Teachers’ Perceptions about Working with Teacher Assistants and Teachers Section III: Strategies in Practice Programming and Planning within a Multi-Faceted Classroom Working Collaboratively with Support Staff for Inclusive Education Assistive Technology and Teacher Assistants Training Programs for Teacher Assistants Reflective Practitioners: Teachers and Support Staff Reflecting Together About the Authors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.737 | 0.733 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".