MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237664144 · doi:10.1093/ibd/izy393.016

P013 UNREGULATED: MEDICAL COMPANIES USE SOCIAL MEDIA TO SELL ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2019· article· en· W4237664144 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Szvarca, Nadeem Tabbara, Jack Masur, Adam Greenfest, Lindsay Clarke, Marie L. Borum

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media in Health Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseMedicineUlcerative colitisHealthcare industryHealth careMedical diagnosisFamily medicineComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPathologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients are increasingly using social media platforms to inform themselves about their medical diagnoses and explore potential treatment options. The medical industry has begun to utilize social media to communicate directly with potential customers. It is crucial that healthcare professionals are aware of this direct communication and realize that such interactions may significantly influence patients’ decisions about disease management. This study evaluated Twitter messaging by the medical sales industry promoting non-conventional treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and assessed origin and content of relevant tweets. The Social Feed Manager software (SFM; version 1.10.0: GW University, 2017) accessed Twitter’s programming interface to obtain content and geographic origin of tweets related to IBD during a 10-day period. SFM queried Twitter using terms including “Crohn’s”, “Ulcerative Colitis”, “IBD”, “and “Inflammatory Bowel Disease” and located origin through the geotag function. Retweets, non-English messages, and tweets that were removed were excluded from analysis. Individual tweets were read and analyzed for content. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Fisher’s Exact test with significance set at p<0.05. 178 tweets originated from the medical sales industry with 97 analyzed after exclusion criteria. 77 (79.4%) messages were geotagged with country of origin, revealing that tweets primarily originated from the US (38; 49.4%), United Kingdom (25; 32.4%) and Canada (9; 11.6%). 19 (24.7%) tweets contained information related to alternative treatments for IBD. Of these 19, 14 were from an identifiable a location: 10 (71.4%) US, 2 (14.2%) UK, 1 (7.1%) from Canada, and 1 (7.1%) from India. These 14 geographically identifiable tweets advertised cannabis/cannabinoid oils (5, 35.7%), antifungals/probiotics (3, 17.6%), and aloe, amino acids, hot peppers, Zeolite, yeast, and plant DNA fragments (6, 42.9%; each with one). Significantly more messages promoting non-conventional treatment options for IBD originated from the US when compared to the UK (p=0.03), Canada (p=0.007) and India (p=0.007). This study revealed that Twitter is a global tool being used to share information regarding alternative therapies for IBD. While this study was limited by Twitter’s determination of relevance and allowable time frame collection, it is important to recognize that social media platforms such as Twitter offer easily accessible, unregulated information directly to patients. As many patients with IBD utilize or consider alternative treatments, it is essential for clinicians to be aware that patients’ therapeutic decisions can be influenced by the medical sales industry’s use of social media. It is critical that healthcare providers are aware of the medical sales industry’s utilization of social media platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1250.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicSocial Media in Health EducationFrench-language works237,207