MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237733627 · doi:10.15761/crt.1000106

Methods for trials of interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions, based on a systematic review of recent randomized trials

2015· review· en· W4237733627 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeffery Ra, Wilczynski Nl, Mustafa Ra

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Research and Trials · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedical prescriptionRandomized controlled trialPsychological interventionMedicineAlternative medicineMedication adherenceSystematic reviewIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyMEDLINEPharmacologyInternal medicinePsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Low patient adherence to prescribed medications is very common and likely the most important barrier to the implementation of effective health care. Controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence have not found consistent success for any type of approach, but the research methods of these trials can lead to biased and imprecise testing, making it difficult to distinguish poor interventions from poor testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.535
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.924
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5350.924
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0300.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.906
GPT teacher head0.766
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Research and TrialsSame topicMedication Adherence and ComplianceFrench-language works237,207