LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS II BREAKING DOWN THE PALACE WALLS: FAMILY MEMBERS PERSPECTIVES OF COMMUNICATION IN ASSISTED LIVING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
unclear. Significant benefits or consequences could be associated with involving others when faced with decisions or problems, especially in "high stakes" financial or health situations. The current study assesses whether self-sufficiency (e.g., "I would rather deal with my problems by myself") and advice seeking (e.g., "I like to get advice from others before making a decision") predict an objective health outcome, mortality risk. Participants were from the National Survey of Midlife in the United States (MIDUS; N = 6,116, 25-75 yrs, Mage = 46.38) with 564 participants identified as deceased over the 14-year follow-up period (2009 National Death Index report). A series of Cox proportional hazards models were estimated. After adjusting for age, gender, education, race, and marital status, self-sufficiency did not significantly predict mortality risk (HR = 0.93; CI = 0.85, 1.02). However, for every 1 unit increase in advice seeking there was a significant 12% reduction in the hazard of dying (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.82, 0.96). Further adjustment for health-related variables did not appreciably change the current findings. The implications for involving others when faced with decisions or problems will be discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".