MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237836616 · doi:10.5383/ijtee.12.01.002

Experimental Determination of the Global Mass Transfer Coefficients of the Tropical Woods in order to Deduce the Drying Curves at the Lower Temperature

2015· article· en· W4237836616 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Merlin Simo‐Tagne, Louis Monkam, Romain Rémond, André Zoulalian, Yann Rogaume, Beguidé Bonoma

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Tropical Timber OrganizationUniversité de Lorraine
KeywordsTemperate climateTropicsAtmospheric sciencesMass transferTropical climateEnvironmental scienceMathematicsSolar dryerForestryBotanyGeographyThermodynamicsPhysicsEcologySolar energyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We determine the global mass transfer coefficients of five tropical woods (obeche, iroko, lotofa, sapele and frake) coming from Cameroon. In this effect, drying kinetics using a solar dryer and a conventional dryer are utilized. In addition, comparison is doing between the values obtained and these coming from Chileans tropical woods and temperate. Thus, when the drying kinetics are between 0.25 to 1.5m/s, dry temperature equal to 33.5°C and wet temperature equal to 25°C, global mass transfer coefficients are between 2x10-5 and 4x10-5 kg/(m2 .s), for the conventional dryer. These values are conform to these obtained on the Chilean tropical woods and less than these obtained on the temperate woods. In the case of an indirect solar dryer functioning between October and November 2004 at Yaoundé, this coefficient is lower because the wood thickness is almost 24mm in the case of conventional drying and 50mm in the case of solar drying. It is coherent to use the correlation established with the temperate wood and given below where the parameters ao, bo, co and p should be specific on the tropical woods:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental EngineeringSame topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207