5 Cosmobility: The Cosmopolitan Pattern of Mobility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cosmobility:The Cosmopolitan Pattern of Mobility 1 "Das war gut.Ich bin dann, glaube ich, auch gleich mit meiner Freundin zusammengezogen.[…] Sie hatte eine Wohnung und ich bin dazu gezogen […] Sie hat mich dann auch besucht zu diesem Zeitpunkt glaube ich.Irgendwann war sie auch da für paar Wochen in den USA."Cosmobility | 221 of study (ll.550-553).Soon she unexpectedly needed to look for another apartment: "Hold on, I had lived with my friend for some time, right, with the one friend of mine.[…] And one day I moved in with another friend.Well, I know that her boyfriend wanted to move in with her and then I moved in with another friend, in ****[district in Berlin, A/N], too.However, it didn't work out well.After one year, […] we gave up the apartment and I thought to myself OK, before looking for another apartment and so on, I'll go abroad again [laughter]."(ll.511-520) 2 Malinka had not yet found her academic way at that point in her life and her living situation turned out to be complicated as she faced a third move within Berlin in a short period of time.Having to find-yet again-another place to stay played a major role in her decision to go abroad.In fact, Malinka presents these biographical circumstances as triggers for another mobility experience.She lived approximately two years in Berlin before leaving Germany, this time for Cuba.This decision appears to be another coping strategy, to avoid the challenges of looking for another apartment in Berlin (where the housing situation is quite challenging) and, importantly, not being able to study what she wanted to study: "Yeah, I didn't have a place at university and I thought OK, perhaps I first/ and somehow, I wanted to go to Cuba.I had wanted to go to Cuba for a long time already by then and it was a rather spontaneous idea and I thought Oh.Hold on.I had already worked a lot by this time.I thought no, you go abroad for half a year and then you apply for a place at university just afterwards."(ll.554-557) 3 2 "Wart mal, 'ne Zeit lang habe ich mit meiner Freundin, also mit der einen Freundin zusammengewohnt […] und irgendwann bin ich dann umgezogen mit einer anderen Freundin.Also, ich weiß sie hatte dann irgendwie einen Freund und er wollte mit ihr zusammenziehen und dann bin ich mit einer Freundin auch in [Berliner Stadtteil, eig.Anm.] zusammengezogen und das hat aber dann irgendwie nach einem Jahr doch irgendwie nicht so gut funktioniert und dann haben wir […] die Wohnung gekündigt und ich dachte OK, bevor ich mir dann eine neue Wohnung suche usw.gehe ich nochmal ins Ausland [Lachen]."3 "Ja, ich hatte keinen Studienplatz und ich dachte naja ok, dann mache ich vielleicht erstmal/ und ich wollte irgendwie nach Kuba.Ich wollte schon länger nach Kuba und es war eine recht spontane Idee und ich dachte ach Moment mal, ich habe ja auch zu dem Zeitpunkt schon viel gearbeitet.Ich dachte nee, dann gehst du nochmal für ein halbes Jahr weg und bewirbst dich für das Semester halt danach."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".