Bibliographic record
Abstract
• ISSUE 2-1, 2011 • 68KANT CRISISThis study approaches the last days of Immanuel Kantthrough the lens of his contemporary biographers andother correspondents. Among the latter, Kant’s brotherand, subsequently, his brother’s family provide a symptomaticreflection upon Kant’s management of his genealogyand his legacy. Yet behind this body of workis another corpus, one which embodies maternal andpaternal legacies that are not readily subsumed by Oedipusor Kant’s philosophy. This work (of art) is Kant’sown body or corpus, which he painstakingly maintainedand which provided a case study for his refelctions onpreventive medicine in The Conflict of the Faculties.William H. Carter studied at the University of Virginia,the University of Heidelberg, and earned his Ph.D. atthe University of California, Santa Barbara. He taughtGerman for three years at Tulane University and recentlyreturned to the Department of World Languagesand Cultures at Iowa State University, where he beganhis teaching career. His current book project is titled“Devilish Details: Goethe’s Public Service and PoliticalEconomy.”Julian Fickler attends the Academy of Fine Arts Karlsruhe,class of Helmut Dorner. He is the recipient of aprestigious fellowship award bestowed by the Künstlerförderungdes Cusanuswerks Bonn. He has exhibitedsolo locally and in group at venues in Berlin and Hamburg.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.174 | 0.044 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".