MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237974359 · doi:10.35540/1818-6254.2019.22.24

ARCTIC

2019· article· en· W4237974359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Georgiy Avetisov, A. Jolondz

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquakes in Northern Eurasia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticGeologyThe arcticSeismologyStructural basinCanada BasinInduced seismicityPhysical geographyOceanographyGeographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The review of the Arctic basin seismicity for 2013 is presented. It is based mainly on the data from the sta-tions of world network, located outside the basin. The data from a single local seismic station was used. It was "Franz Josef Land" station with two sets of seismic sensors, ZF1 and ZF2. The station is a part the Ar-khangelsk network, operating in the region since September 2011. There were 38 earthquakes with mb=3.0–4.6 in the Arctic basin in total. A map of their epicenters is provided. 28 of them are connected with the seismically active zone, which extends through the deep-water part of the Arctic basin to the shelf of the Laptev Sea. For two earthquakes, the parameters of focal mechanisms are given according to the GCMT da-ta. The magnitude frequency distribution for 2013 is compared with the distributions for 1990-2012. The level of seismic energy released in 2013 is 1.3 times lower than in 2012 and 1.6 times higher than its average one for 23 previous years. The distribution of earthquakes in the Arctic region in 2013 is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarthquakes in Northern EurasiaSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207