Formation and Characteristics of Carbonaceous Deposits from Heavy Hydrocarbon Coking Vapors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deposition of carbonaceous material in the cyclone exit line is a chronic problem for fluid cokers and is a key process limitation to achieving longer run length. Extensive characterization studies were conducted for laboratory deposits from a bench-scale bitumen coker using modern analytical techniques, e.g., elemental analysis, X-ray fluorescence, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, diffusive reflection infrared spectroscopy, and solid-state 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance. Simulated distillation was also applied to solvent extracts of deposits. Results substantiate that on the laboratory scale physical condensation rather than chemical reaction was the primary reason for fluid coker cyclone exit line fouling. Entrained liquid droplets also contribute to the deposit formation. Although there are both polyaromatic and aliphatic structures in fresh laboratory deposits, the former dominate. High-temperature operation led to deposits an increased polyaromatic content. Industrial deposits are more cokelike than laboratory deposits, and they differ in morphology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it