Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes Notes 1. G. R. Elton, The Practice of History (London: Fontana, 1969), 11. 2. Georg G. Iggers, New Directions in European Historiography, rev. edn (Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1984), 5. 3. Michael Oakeshott, Experience and its Modes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1933), 143. 1. Joseph de Maistre, Considerations on France (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1974), 93. 2. Ibid., 95. 3. See Joseph W. Bendersky, Carl Schmitt: Theorist for the Reich (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1983); George Schwab, The Challenge of Exception: An Introduction to the Political Ideas of Carl Schmitt between 1921 and 1936 (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1989). 1. This, at any rate, is the 1547 version. Earlier recountings referred to him as Cartaphilus, a Roman gate-keeper (1228) or Malchus, also a Roman. 2. There is some irony between Stoker's almost unconscious anti-Semitism and his first name of Abraham, which suggests a biblical link to the covenant of the Patriarch. 3. This accusation is not just a historical curiosity. A recent quote from William Donahue, leader of the US Catholic League states, “Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews. … Hollywood likes anal sex.” Quoted in Patrick Goldstein, “The Big Picture,” Los Angeles Times, 28 December 2004.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.039 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it