MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238083692 · doi:10.2118/19190-ms

A CFD-Based Model to Locate Flow-Restriction Induced Hydrate Deposition in Pipelines

2008· article· en· W4238083692 on OpenAlexafffund
Esam Jassim, Majid Abedinzadegan Abdi, Yuri S. Muzychka

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of Offshore Technology Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Resources CanadaAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
KeywordsPipeline transportComputational fluid dynamicsComputer scienceDeposition (geology)Petroleum engineeringFlow (mathematics)Flow assuranceMarine engineeringMechanicsHydrateGeologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringChemistryPhysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrate is a major risk in all high pressure natural gas transport lines including the connecting lines and manifold systems in all offshore production facilities. Marine transportation of compressed natural gas is one example where prediction of hydrate formation in loading and unloading lines and manifold systems is a requirement for the safe transport of gas to and from ocean going ships. Production facility components such as chokes, velocity-controlled subsurface safety valves, and conventional valves and fittings can all act as restrictions to the flowing fluids, resulting in changes in flow conditions, which could lead to the formation of hydrate in the pipeline.The principal objectives of our research can be summarized as:to identify the location where hydrate blockage would most likely develop,to study the effect of parameters such as orifice geometry, gas composition, real gas behaviour, and surrounding conditions on the agglomeration spot, andto validate the numerical results with available experimental data.Numerical simulation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques is underway to model the mechanism of the deposition based on the most recent theories of the deposition phenomenon. The model uses CFD algorithm for assisting to configure the flow field using real gas models and predicting the actual fluid properties. The nucleation theory and driving force models and their relationships to hydrate formation are also used to predict the incipient hydrate particle size and growth rate.In this paper, the theory of the deposition mechanism is briefly discussed. The application of the theory in turbulent regime for different hydrate particle sizes is then presented. Finally the approach used for deposition process is discussed.The study concludes that two phenomenon control the deposition mechanism, namely: the Brownian diffusion mechanism by which the movement of small particles (<1µm) can be explained and the inertia mechanism which controls the dynamics of the relatively large particles. The collection efficiency, the indicator of the deposited particles, decreases as the size of the particles increases in the diffusion region whereas in the impaction region, the collection efficiency increases with particle size.Introduction. Particle deposition is a process that plays a key role in many fields ranging from atmospheric applications to material sciences. In the oil and gas field, the accumulation of hydrate is one of the most challenging aspects in flow assurance studies. It could partially plug and eventually completely block the natural gas pipeline, causing serious risk to the safety of operating personnel and equipment as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of Offshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207