Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reid B. Locklin, Liturgy of Liberation: A Christian Commentary on Shankara's Upadeśasāhasrī, reviewed by Anand Venkatkrishnan David Andrew Gilland, Law and Gospel in Emil Brunner's Earlier Dialectical Theology, reviewed by Donald K. McKim Johannes Miroslav Oravecz, God as Love: The Concept and Spiritual Aspects of Agape in Modern Russian Religious Thought, reviewed by Walter N. Sisto Esther McIntosh, John Macmurray's Religious Philosophy: What It Means to Be a Person, reviewed by Jack Costello John D. Dadosky, The Eclipse and Recovery of Beauty: A Lonergan Approach, reviewed by Reid B. Locklin Dalibor Renic, Ethical & Epistemic Normativity: Lonergan & Virtue Epistemology, reviewed by Wayne Lott Fred Craddock, Dale Goldsmith, and Joy V. Goldsmith, Speaking of Dying: Recovering the Church's Voice in the Face of Death, reviewed by Michael Buttrey Craig G. Bartholomew and Michael W. Goheen, Christian Philosophy: A Systematic and Narrative Introduction, reviewed by Murray Johnston Shannon Craigo-Snell, The Empty Church: Theater, Theology, and Bodily Hope, reviewed by HyeRan Kim-Cragg James K. Beilby and Paul Rhodes Eddy, eds., Understanding Spiritual Warfare: Four Views, reviewed by David Reed Vittorio Hösle, God as Reason: Essays in Philosophical Theology, reviewed by Pamela J. Reeve John Webster, The Domain of the Word: Scripture and Theological Reason, reviewed by Lane Scruggs Jeff Nowers and Néstor Medina, eds., Theology and the Crisis of Engagement: Essays on the Relationship between Theology and the Social Sciences, reviewed by Becca Whitla
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.142 | 0.065 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".