MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fine Specificity of B-Cell Tolerance to Blood Group Antigens Following ABO-Incompatible (Aboi) Heart Transplantation

2012· article· en· W4238125581 on OpenAlexaff
M. Jeyakanthan, Peter J. Meloncelli, Stephanie Tollenaar, I. Larsen, Todd L. Lowary, Christopher W. Cairo, Jillian M. Buriak, Lori J. West

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsABO blood group systemEpitopeBlood type (non-human)AntibodyTransplantationImmunohistochemistryMonoclonal antibodyAntigenHeart transplantationImmunologyMolecular biologyMedicineBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Histo-blood group ABH(O) ags are oligosaccharides present as glycolipids or glycoproteins. A, B or H epitopes are carried by 6 different internal carbohydrate backbones (type I-VI), forming antigenically distinct variants, each type differentially expressed in human tissues. In heart, only type II structures are expressed (on vascular endothelium) whereas red cells express type I-IV. Identifying natural antibody (ab) clones specific to these ABH epitopes may be important in the setting of ABOi transplantation. Our objectives were to 1) develop a diagnostic tool to detect abs specific to ABH epitopes on all 6 carbohydrate backbones and 2) characterize abs in volunteers and patients who received ABOi heart transplants as infants. Methods: Chemically synthesized A type I-VI, B type I-VI and H type I-VI were printed onto microarray slides; spot morphology and ags were confirmed by monoclonal abs to ABH ags. After initial optimization, plasma from different blood group individuals and patients were hybridized and bound IgM, IgG and IgA detected with fluorescently-labelled secondary abs. Slides were scanned with a microarray scanner and Mean Fluorescent Intensities (MFI) determined using Imagene software. Results: Subtype-specific IgM, IgG and IgA abs varied substantially amongst individuals with different blood groups as well as the same blood group. In infants who received ABOi transplants, abs to donor blood group ags were not detected against type II subtype (fig 1) compared to same blood type controls (fig 2). Immunohistochemistry studies on cardiac biopsies confirmed that only type II carbohydrates were expressed on endothelium.[Figure 1][Figure 2]Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates that infant recipients of ABOi transplants remain deficient in production of antibodies to A-ag expressed in the cardiac graft, despite detection of antibodies to irrelevant A-ag detected by agglutination assay. Thus the ABO-microarray is valuable for subtype-specific blood group abs relevant to the graft. This tool will allow enhanced safety of ABO-incompatible organ transplantation and improve study of mechanisms of tolerance and/or accommodation in the clinical setting. Microarray technology provides analysis of tiny sample volumes (< 5 ml plasma), and simultaneous characterization of all ab isotypes, invaluable when testing infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207