MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238241308 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-11298

Variable Length Windowing to Improve Non-Negative Matrix Factorization of Music Signals

2015· dissertation· en· W4238241308 on OpenAlexaff
Revanth Pentyala

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShort-time Fourier transformNon-negative matrix factorizationSIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Matrix decompositionAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceTime–frequency analysisWindow functionSpeech recognitionDimension (graph theory)Fourier transformMathematicsDivergence (linguistics)Variable (mathematics)Frame (networking)Fourier analysisComputer visionFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-negative matrix factorization(NMF) has shown positive results in learning musical notes over other blind source separation techniques like independent component analysis (ICA) and principal component analysis (PCA). The magnitude short time Fourier transform (STFT) is typically given as input for the non-negative matrix factorization algorithm for learning. Non-negative matrix factorization treats each frame of the magnitude short time Fourier transform as independent and identically distributed vectors. Due to fixed length windowing, a single note might be spread across multiple frames with varying proportions of the note structure. Improving the stationarity characteristics of the signal within the STFT is expected to improve the qualitative performance of note extraction by the NMF algorithm. To this extent, we propose a signal dependent variable length window based STFT to effectively capture the stationarity of the signal within each frame of the magnitude STFT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207