MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238249806 · doi:10.18740/s4401g

6,1 Part Two: pages 125- back cover

2010· paratext· en· W4238249806 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Admin Admin

Bibliographic record

VenueSocialist studies · 2010
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)Political scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article offers a critical interpretation of the state and media reactions to the crisis at Oka, Québec in the summer of 1990.Drawing on Marx's analysis of Bonapartism, or fascism, it is argued that the Canadian state was willing to use excessive force to suppress the Mohawk dissidents.Its fascist methods also included racial demonizing and using the basest impulses of angry crowds to intimidate Natives.Mainstream media sources played an unmistakable role in channelling this racist violence against the rebelling Aboriginals.The function of competing nationalisms (Mohawk, Québécois and Canadian) in this episode is analyzed as well.It is argued that solidarity between the working class and the Mohawks may have resulted in a more positive outcome of the conflict.A renewed set of relations between the Canadian left and Aboriginals could reveal constructive ways forward for groups struggling under the weight of capitalist society and its state. RésuméCet article offre une interprétation critique des réactions de l'Etat et des médias à la crise de Oka, Québec dans l'été 1990.Utilisant l'analyse que Marx avait faite du Bonapartisme ou fascisme, il suggère que l'Etat canadien était prêt à employer une force excessive afin de supprimer les dissidents Socialist Studies: the Journal of the Society for Socialist Studies 6(1) Spring 2010: 125-136 Mohawk.Ses méthodes fascistes incluaient la diabolisation raciale et l'utilisation des pires impulsions des foules en colère afin d'intimider les Autochtones.Les médias dominants ont joué un rôle indubitable en canalisant cette violence raciste contre les Autochtones rebelles.La fonction des nationalismes rivaux (Mohawk, Québécois et Canadien) dans cet épisode est également analysée.Cet article défend que la solidarité entre la classe ouvrière et les Mohawk aurait pu aboutir à un résultat plus positif du conflit.Des relations renouvelées entre la gauche Canadienne et les Autochtones pourrait révéler des voies constructives pour des groupes luttant sous le poids de la société capitaliste et son Etat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5420.313

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocialist studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207