MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238272806 · doi:10.1017/s0261444802241890

Language testing

2003· article· en· W4238272806 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Georges, James M. Hudson, Amy And Bruckman

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage Teaching · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)LinguisticsForeign languageLanguage assessmentPsychologyHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

03–174 Andrews, Stephen (U. of Hong Kong SAR, China; Email : sandrews@hkucc.hku.hk ), Fullilove, John and Wong, Yama . Targeting washback – a case-study. System (Oxford, UK), 30 , 2 (2002), 207–23. 03–175 Bourguignon, Claire (Université du Havre, France). L'importance de la représentation dans l'activité d'évaluation de la communication langagière: application au project europoliglot. [The importance of representation patterns in assessing linguistic communication: A multi-language application – project EUROPOLIGLOT.] Les Cahiers de l'APLIUT (Grenoble, France), 21 , 2 (2001), 62–78. 03–176 Esmaeili, Hameed . Integrated reading and writing tasks and ESL students' reading and writing performance in an English language test. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes (Toronto, Ont.), 58 , 4 (2002), 599–622. 03–177 Ginther, April (Purdue U., USA; Email : aginther@purdue.edu ). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing (London, UK), 19 , 2 (2002), 133–67. 03–178 Godev, Concepción B. (U. of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA), Martinez-Gibson, Elizabeth A. and Toris, Carol C. M. Foreign language reading comprehension test: L1 versus L2 in open-ended questions. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA), 35 , 2 (2002), 202–21. 03–179 Goodfellow, Robin (Open U., Milton Keynes, UK; Email : r.goodfellow@open.ac.uk ), Lamy, Marie-Noëlle and Jones, Glyn . Assessing learners' writing using lexical frequency. ReCALL (Cambridge, UK), 14 , 1 (2002), 133–45. 03–180 Issac, Fabrice (Université Paris-Nord, France; Email : fabrice.issac@lli.univ-paris13.fr ) and Hû, Olivier . Formalism for evaluation: Feedback on learner knowledge representation. Computer Assisted Language Learning (Lisse, The Netherlands), 15 , 2 (2002), 183–99. 03–181 Kim, Duk-Ja (Hansung U., Seoul, Korea; Email : deog@hansung.ac.kr ) and Kyungmi, O. Washback on 12th grade English classes of the English tests within Korean University entrance exams. English Teaching (Korea), 57 , 3 (2002), 303–31. 03–182 Kobayashi, Miyoko (U. of Warwick, UK; Email : Miyoko.Kobayashi@warwick.ac.uk ). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organisation and response format. Language Testing (London, UK), 19 , 2 (2002), 193–220. 03–183 Major, Roy C. (Arizona State U., Tucson, USA), Fitzmaurice, Susan F., Bunta, Ferenc and Balasubramanian, Chandrika . The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA), 36 , 2 (2002), 173–90. 03–184 Meara, Paul, Jacobs, Gabriel and Rodgers, Catherine (U. of Wales Swansea, UK; Email : p.m.meara@swan.ac.uk ). Lexical signatures in foreign language free-form texts. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics (Leuven, Belgium), 135–136 (2002), 85–96. 03–185 Myers, Marie J. (Queens U., Ontario, Canada; Email : myersmj@educ.queensu.ca ). Computer-assisted second language assessment: To the top of the pyramid. ReCALL (Cambridge, UK), 14 , 1 (2002), 167–81. 03–186 O'Loughlin, Kieran (The U. of Melbourne, Australia; Email : kjo@unimelb.edu.au ). The impact of gender in oral proficiency testing. Language Testing (London, UK), 19 , 2 (2002), 169–92. 03–187 Orr, Michael (The British Council, Valencia, Spain; Email : mike.orr@es.britcounc.org ). The FCE Speaking test: Using rater reports to help interpret test scores. System (Oxford, UK), 30 , 2 (2002), 143–54. 03–188 Patri, Mrudula (City U. of Hong Kong; Email : elpatri@cityu.edu.hk ). The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing (London, UK), 19 , 2 (2002), 109–31. 03–189 Song, Bailin and August, Bonne (City U. of New York, USA; Email : bsong@kbcc.cuny.edu ). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: A powerful alternative? Journal of Second Language Writing (Norwood, NJ, USA), 11 , 1 (2002), 49–72. 03–190 Wilhelm, Kim Hughes and Rivers, Marilyn (Southern Illinois U., USA). An audience approach to EAP writing assessment: Learners, teachers, outsiders. Applied Language Learning (Presidio of Monterey, CA, USA), 12 , 2 (2001), 177–90. 03–191 Yien, Liju (Nat. Lien Ho Inst. of Technology, Taiwan). Effective test-taking strategies on English tests: Implications from Taiwanese students. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics (Hong Kong), 6 , 2 (2001), 22–43.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguage TeachingSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207