MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238272806 · doi:10.1017/s0261444802241890

Language testing

2003· article· en· W4238272806 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Georges, James M. Hudson, Amy And Bruckman

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage Teaching · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)LinguisticsForeign languageLanguage assessmentPsychologyHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

03–174Andrews, Stephen (U. of Hong Kong SAR, China; Email: sandrews@hkucc.hku.hk ), Fullilove, John and Wong, Yama. Targeting washback – a case-study. System (Oxford, UK), 30, 2 (2002), 207–23. 03–175Bourguignon, Claire (Université du Havre, France). L'importance de la représentation dans l'activité d'évaluation de la communication langagière: application au project europoliglot. [The importance of representation patterns in assessing linguistic communication: A multi-language application – project EUROPOLIGLOT.] Les Cahiers de l'APLIUT (Grenoble, France), 21, 2 (2001), 62–78. 03–176Esmaeili, Hameed. Integrated reading and writing tasks and ESL students' reading and writing performance in an English language test. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes (Toronto, Ont.), 58, 4 (2002), 599–622. 03–177Ginther, April (Purdue U., USA; Email: aginther@purdue.edu ). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing (London, UK), 19, 2 (2002), 133–67. 03–178Godev, Concepción B. (U. of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA), Martinez-Gibson, Elizabeth A. and Toris, Carol C. M. Foreign language reading comprehension test: L1 versus L2 in open-ended questions. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA), 35, 2 (2002), 202–21. 03–179Goodfellow, Robin (Open U., Milton Keynes, UK; Email: r.goodfellow@open.ac.uk ), Lamy, Marie-Noëlle and Jones, Glyn. Assessing learners' writing using lexical frequency. ReCALL (Cambridge, UK), 14, 1 (2002), 133–45. 03–180Issac, Fabrice (Université Paris-Nord, France; Email: fabrice.issac@lli.univ-paris13.fr ) and Hû, Olivier. Formalism for evaluation: Feedback on learner knowledge representation. Computer Assisted Language Learning (Lisse, The Netherlands), 15, 2 (2002), 183–99. 03–181Kim, Duk-Ja (Hansung U., Seoul, Korea; Email: deog@hansung.ac.kr ) and Kyungmi, O. Washback on 12th grade English classes of the English tests within Korean University entrance exams. English Teaching (Korea), 57, 3 (2002), 303–31. 03–182Kobayashi, Miyoko (U. of Warwick, UK; Email: Miyoko.Kobayashi@warwick.ac.uk ). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organisation and response format. Language Testing (London, UK), 19, 2 (2002), 193–220. 03–183Major, Roy C. (Arizona State U., Tucson, USA), Fitzmaurice, Susan F., Bunta, Ferenc and Balasubramanian, Chandrika. The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA), 36, 2 (2002), 173–90. 03–184Meara, Paul, Jacobs, Gabriel and Rodgers, Catherine (U. of Wales Swansea, UK; Email: p.m.meara@swan.ac.uk ). Lexical signatures in foreign language free-form texts. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics (Leuven, Belgium), 135–136 (2002), 85–96. 03–185Myers, Marie J. (Queens U., Ontario, Canada; Email: myersmj@educ.queensu.ca ). Computer-assisted second language assessment: To the top of the pyramid. ReCALL (Cambridge, UK), 14, 1 (2002), 167–81. 03–186O'Loughlin, Kieran (The U. of Melbourne, Australia; Email: kjo@unimelb.edu.au ). The impact of gender in oral proficiency testing. Language Testing (London, UK), 19, 2 (2002), 169–92. 03–187Orr, Michael (The British Council, Valencia, Spain; Email: mike.orr@es.britcounc.org ). The FCE Speaking test: Using rater reports to help interpret test scores. System (Oxford, UK), 30, 2 (2002), 143–54. 03–188Patri, Mrudula (City U. of Hong Kong; Email: elpatri@cityu.edu.hk ). The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing (London, UK), 19, 2 (2002), 109–31. 03–189Song, Bailin and August, Bonne (City U. of New York, USA; Email: bsong@kbcc.cuny.edu ). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: A powerful alternative? Journal of Second Language Writing (Norwood, NJ, USA), 11, 1 (2002), 49–72. 03–190Wilhelm, Kim Hughes and Rivers, Marilyn (Southern Illinois U., USA). An audience approach to EAP writing assessment: Learners, teachers, outsiders. Applied Language Learning (Presidio of Monterey, CA, USA), 12, 2 (2001), 177–90. 03–191Yien, Liju (Nat. Lien Ho Inst. of Technology, Taiwan). Effective test-taking strategies on English tests: Implications from Taiwanese students. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics (Hong Kong), 6, 2 (2001), 22–43.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3090.246

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguage TeachingSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207