Expression of Cancer testis Antigens in Tumor-adjacent Normal Liver Predicts Post-resection Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: High recurrence rates after resection of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with curative intent and lack of effective therapy for advanced disease impair clinical outcomes of HCC. Cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) are suitable targets for cancer immunotherapy if selectively expressed in tumor cells. The aims of this study were to establish a panel of CTAs that are frequently and selectively expressed in tumors of HCC-patients, and to investigate whether CTAs might be expressed in tumor-free liver tissues of HCC-patients.Methods: Surgically-resected tumor and paired tumor-free (TFL) tissues of HCC patients (n=100), healthy livers (n=21), and other healthy tissues (n=22 different tissues) were assessed for mRNA expression of 49 carefully selected CTAs by RT-qPCR. Protein expression of 5 CTAs was determined by immunohistochemistry (n=78).Results: Twelve CTAs were expressed at mRNA level in ≥10% of HCC-tumor tissues and not in healthy tissues except testis. In tumors, mRNA and protein of ≥ 1 CTA was expressed in 78% and 71% of HCC-patients, respectively. In TFL, CTA mRNA and protein expression was found in 45% and 30% of HCC-patients, respectively. Interestingly, CTA expression in TFL was an independent negative prognostic factor for HCC-recurrence and survival after tumor resection.Conclusions: We established a novel panel of 12 testis-restricted CTAs expressed in tumors of most HCC-patients, that can be safely used for immunotherapeutic targeting of HCC. The increased risk of HCC recurrence in patients with CTA expression in TFL suggests that CTA-expressing (pre-)malignant cells may be a source of HCC recurrence. Therefore, immunotherapeutic targeting of these antigens should be considered as adjuvant therapy to prevent HCC-recurrence after tumor resection. Lay summary:Expression of multiple defined cancer testis antigens in non-cancerous liver tissue is associated with significantly increased cancer-recurrence and worse patient survival after tumor resection. We propose that immunotherapeutic targeting of these antigens may prevent HCC recurrence after tumor resection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".