MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238365345 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckv172.120

6.K. Pitch presentations: Health and healthcare of elderly

2015· article· en· W4238365345 on OpenAlexaff
Herman Van, Oyen Van Oyen, Nicolas Berger, Emmanuelle Cambois, Marcin Grysztar, Agnieszka Kopeć, M Rodzinka, Mariusz Duplaga, Bernard Burnand, Jean‐Marie Januel, William A. Ghali, Patrick S. Romano, Richard White, P Hider, Cyrille Colin, Francesca Pieralli, Chiara Lorini, Silvia Forni, Anna Sergi, Andrea Vannucci, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careMedicineFamily medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundGlobal Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI) measures disability in terms of participation restriction.It lies at the basis of the European indicator Healthy Life Years (HLY).The objective of this paper is to review validity and reliability studies of GALI.Methods Expert consultation and database searches (Pubmed, Google Scholar, using keywords ''GALI (excluding name)'' and ''Global activity limitation'') identified 9 manuscripts.Studies were grouped by scope (national vs. international scope) and objectives: (1) association studies linking GALI to other disability measures (both objective and self-reported measures), (2) outcome studies linking GALI to mortality or health care use, and (3) reliability studies.Results There were 4 association studies.Two of them use international data, one of which uses objective measures.There was 1 health care expenditure study and 3 mortality studies (1 international).One reliability study looked at national data only.None of the studies indicated a validity failure.The international association studies concluded that GALI effectively captures limitations as measured by objective and selfreported measures and that this is valid for different countries.GALI is a good predictor of mortality.Its predictive power is linked to the severity of the limitations and decreases over time (10 years).GALI was an important predictor of health care expenditure even after adjustment for chronic conditions.The weighted Kappa as reliability measure was 0.68. ConclusionsEvidence provided by a first (limited) set of different validation exercises suggests that (1) GALI, as global measure of participation restriction, is an instrument with sufficient validity and reliability, (2) GALI has an added value over complex measures of health and disability, as well as over general measures of health such as self-rated health.Further (inter)national validity and reliability studies are needed given the international use of GALI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.451
GPT teacher head0.528
Teacher spread0.077 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207