MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238492150 · doi:10.1002/bjs.10904

Swiss Society of Surgery

2018· article· en· W4238492150 on OpenAlexaff
Lilian Roth, Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov, Marcel Schneider, Tobias Graf, Anurag Gupta, Kevin R. Gertsch, A Holtz, Reinhard Westkämper, Jochen Lange, Michel Adamina, Severina Leu, Ralph F. Staerkle, Stefan Gaukel, Louis M. Fink, Christopher Soll, Davis M. Aasen, Martina Vitz, Leonhard E. Ramseier, Raphael N. Vuille‐dit‐Bille, Maria E. Trujillo, Werner Kolb, C Engetschwiler, S Caviezel-Firner, R De Giuli-Buehrer, Thomas Clerici, Reto M. Kaderli, Marko Spanjol, András Kollár, Lukas Bütikofer, Viktoria Gloy, Christian Seiler, Emanuel Christ, Piotr Radojewski, Matthias Briel, Martin A. Walter, Manuel O. Jakob, Thomas Malinka, Deborah Stroka, Andrew J. Macpherson, Daniel Candinas, Mercedes Gomez de Agüero, Guido Beldi

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGeneral surgerySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: CRS/HIPEC has become a treatment of choice for many patients with peritoneal metastasis originating from appendix or colorectal tumors, leading to improved survival rates. However, the pathophysiology behind HIPEC is only poorly understood, and there is an ongoing discussion which protocol to use for HIPEC: a mitomycin C based protocol currently preferred by many surgeons in the US, or the oxaliplatin based protocol developed by FRENCH groups. Here, we describe for the first-time dramatic changes in the postoperative systemic inflammatory reaction, highly different among treatment protocols. Methods: 164 patients after CRS/HIPEC were included in a prospective database. HIPEC was performed according the US protocol (90 min at 42 C with mitomycin C/doxorubicin) or the FRENCH protocol (30 min at 43 C with oxaliplatin). White blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), body temperature, thrombocytes were serially analyzed. In (n = 61) patients, serial blood samples were assessed for procalcitonin (PCT), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), pancreatic stone protein (PSP), and bacterial components (16 s rDNA). Results: In patients treated with the US protocol, a significant secondary CRP increase (p = 0.039) was observed in the second postoperative week, even after uncomplicated CRS/HIPEC, highlighting an ongoing inflammatory process (Figure This increase did not correlate with infectious complications, and hence, postoperative CRP levels did not contribute to clinical decision making. To test our hypothesis of intestinal translocation after HIPEC with the US protocol, patients with an uncomplicated course were further explored, and compared to patients after HIPEC with oxaliplatin (FRENCH). After HIPEC with the US protocol, but not after the HIPEC with the FRENCH protocol, a massive increase of PSP (p = 0.014) (Figure Finally, elevated 16 s rDNA levels (p = 0.022) in the serum (Figure Conclusion: HIPEC with the US protocol induces a systemic inflammatory response secondary to intestinal bacterial translocation. These dramatic changes, not observed after HIPEC with oxaliplatin, are an important and novel finding in the still poorly understood pathophysiology of HIPEC. Beilage 1347.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicMedical History and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207