Granisle British Columbia: a feasibility study to convert the community from propane to natural gas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Natural gas is a relatively clean burning reliable source of energy as compared to other fossil fuels, and is used to heat millions of homes across Canada. In recent years the oil and gas industries have developed procedures for extraction of natural gas using unconventional methods that have resulted in proven vast reserves in Canada. These vast reserves are driving the cost of the energy source to record low prices. Choosing natural gas for space, water and process heating in the residential, commercial and industrial sectors can decrease the demand for electricity generation. This can improve the overall efficiency of energy utilization and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (CAPP, 2012) With the reduced cost of this energy source coupled with recent technological improvements in the compression and transportation of natural gas, the ability to supply this abundant resource to remote small communities is becoming a reality. This project will consider existing technological methods of loading, transporting, and unloading methods for natural gas and determine the feasibility of supplying the product to the remote communities of Granisle, Moricetown, and Hazelton in North West British Columbia as a competitive alternative to propane and oil as a source of home heating. Without significant demand for energy and considering the cost of infrastructure and operations the option of supplying natural gas to a remote community is not viable. However, with the addition of a large industrial customer such as a mining operation the demand for the resource increases significantly thereby creating a viable project. --Leaf i.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".