MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238616846 · doi:10.1145/3176245

Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs

2017· paratext· en· W4238616846 on OpenAlexfundno aff
June Andronick, Amy Felty

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, programming, and type systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignTechnische Universität MünchenUniversität des SaarlandesUniversité Paris-SaclayChalmers Tekniska HögskolaVrije Universiteit AmsterdamUniversity of New South WalesNanyang Technological UniversityPrinceton UniversityNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyUniversity of OttawaTechnische Universität DarmstadtAarhus UniversitetUniversità degli Studi di MilanoUniversity of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationUniversity of TwenteMicrosoft ResearchMax Planck Institute for Software SystemsCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversidade Federal da ParaíbaYale University
KeywordsMathematical proofAxiomCertificationComputer scienceProof assistantFormal methodsInferenceProgramming languageSoftware engineeringTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsPolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanizing formal systems, given via axioms and inference rules, together with proofs about them plays an important role in establishing trust in formal developments. Over the past decade, the POPLMark challenge popularized the use of proof assistants ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLogic, programming, and type systemsFrench-language works237,207