MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract CT115: Phase II study of dianhydrogalactitol (VAL-083) in patients with MGMT-unmethylated, bevacizumab-naïve recurrent glioblastoma

2019· article· en· W4238704533 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara O’Brien, John de Groot, Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka, Shiao‐Pei Weathers, Jeffrey Bacha, Dennis Brown, Anne Steinø, John Langlands, Richard Schwartz, Sarath Kanekal, Lorena Lopez, Marta Peñas-Prado

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDelmar (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideBevacizumabMedicineOncologyInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchClinical trialIn vivoCancer researchRadiation therapyChemotherapyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer. Current standard-of-care includes surgery followed by concurrent therapy with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) and maintenance TMZ. Almost all GBM patients experience recurrent/progressive disease, and median survival after recurrence is 3-9 months. Effective therapies for recurrent GBM (rGBM) are lacking, representing a significant unmet medical need. The unmethylated promoter for O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) is a validated biomarker for TMZ-resistance and is correlated with poor prognoses. Second-line treatment with the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab (BEV) has not improved survival, and 5-year survival is less than 3%. VAL-083 is a bi-functional DNA-targeting agent that rapidly induces interstrand cross-links at N7-guanine, leading to DNA double-strand breaks and cell-death. VAL-083’s cytotoxicity is independent of MGMT status, and VAL-083 overcomes TMZ-resistance in GBM in vitro and in vivo models. We previously completed a 3+3 dose-escalation trial of VAL-083 in TMZ- and BEV-refractory rGBM. 40mg/m2/day given on days 1-3 of a 21-day cycle was generally well-tolerated, and this dose was selected for further clinical evaluation in Phase II trials. The trial described here is an ongoing single-arm, biomarker-driven Phase II trial in MGMT-unmethylated BEV-naïve adult rGBM. In this trial, patients are receiving VAL-083 at 30 or 40mg/m2/day on days 1-3 of a 21-day cycle. Tumor response is assessed by MRI approximately every 42 days, per RANO criteria. The primary objective of this study is to determine if VAL-083 improves median overall survival (mOS) for MGMT-unmethylated rGBM patients compared to a historical mOS of 7.1 months for such patients treated with lomustine (EORTC26101). Secondary efficacy endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and quality-of-life (QOL) evaluation using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) self-reporting tool. Thirty-five (35) subjects have received 40 mg/m2/day VAL-083 as the starting dose. Consistent with prior studies, myelosuppression (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) is the most common adverse event in this study, and we observed that a higher potential for myelosuppression appears to be inversely correlated with the number of cycles of prior TMZ maintenance therapy, (>5 cycles vs. ≤5 cycles, p<0.05). Therefore, to minimize the potential for hematological toxicity in patients who have had significant prior TMZ maintenance therapy, subsequent patients in this study have initiated treatment with a starting VAL-083 dose of 30 mg/m2/d x 3 every 21 days. Earlier initiation of maintenance treatment with VAL-083 in the therapeutic management plan, in lieu of maintenance TMZ in MGMT-unmethylated GBM patients is currently under consideration. Enrollment, safety data and protocol updates will be provided at the meeting. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02717962. Citation Format: Barbara O'Brien, John De Groot, Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka, Shiao-Pei Weathers, Jeffrey Bacha, Dennis Brown, Anne Steino, John Langlands, Richard Schwartz, Sarath Kanekal, Lorena Lopez, Marta Penas-Prado. Phase II study of dianhydrogalactitol (VAL-083) in patients with MGMT-unmethylated, bevacizumab-naïve recurrent glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT115.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→