MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238787331 · doi:10.5383/jttm.02.02.001

Model calibration to simulate driving recommendations for traffic flow optimization in oversaturated city traffic

2020· article· en· W4238787331 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christian Eissler, Stefan Kaufmann

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Traffic and Transportation Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueueTraffic flow (computer networking)CalibrationTraffic signalComputer scienceTraffic waveTraffic conflictTraffic congestion reconstruction with Kerner's three-phase theoryTraffic bottleneckTraffic simulationTraffic optimizationQueueing theorySimulationTransport engineeringReal-time computingTraffic congestionFloating car dataMicrosimulationEngineeringComputer networkStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long queues at signals cause fuel-consuming stop-and-go traffic. Empirical measurements have shown that driving behaviour can have an important impact on queue length and thus on the occurrence of stop and go traffic. This led to the question of whether even a few vehicles can have a measurable influence on the traffic situation in congested city traffic. In this work we use a complete microscopic spatiotemporal measurement of congested city traffic at a signal to i) calibrate a both longitudinal and latitudinal driving model and then to ii) examine how changes in single vehicle's driving behaviour could improve the situation. The model calibration is realized using a genetic algorithm. In this way, a realistic heterogeneous traffic scenario that has similar properties as empirical traffic could be simulated. We then show that already changing the behaviour of a single vehicle per traffic light cycle can significantly reduce the number of vehicles waiting in queues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Traffic and Transportation ManagementSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207