Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ro'se.o.coc'cus. M.L. adj. roseus rose, pink; Gr. n. coccus sphere or spheroidal shape; M.L. masc. n. Roseococcus pink spherical bacterium. Cells are Gram negative , coccoidal , pink and motile by means of polar flagella. Divide by binary fission. Bacteriochlorophyll a and carotenoid pigments are present. Obligately aerobic , chemoorganotrophic (respiratory metabolism) and facultatively photoheterotrophic . No growth occurs under anaerobic conditions in the light . May use thiosulfate as an additional energy source. Methanol is not utilized. NaCl not required for growth. The mol % G + C of the DNA is : 70.4. Type species : Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus Yurkov, Stackebrandt, Holmes, Fuerst, Hugenholtz, Golecki, Gad' on, Gorlenko, Kompantseva and Drews 1994c, 432. Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the genus Roseococcus is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Pseudomonadati / Pseudomonadota / Alphaproteobacteria / Rhodospirillales / Acetobacteraceae / Roseococcus The genus Roseococcus can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as g__Roseococcus (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Pseudomonadota / c__Alphaproteobacteria / o__Acetobacterales / f__Acetobacteraceae / g__Roseococcus * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it