MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Magnetotelluric Surveys Across Major Precambrian Tectonic Boundaries in Southern Western Australia

2010· article· en· W4238793510 on OpenAlexaff
Mike Dentith, Shane Evans, Ian J. Ferguson, Luis A. Gallardo, Aurore Joly, Peter A. Cawood, Cam McCuaig, Ian Tyler

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTerraneCratonYilgarn CratonArcheanGreenstone beltShear zonePrecambrianFibrous jointCrustMantle (geology)TectonicsProterozoicGeochemistryPaleontologyPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryMagnetotelluric data have been recorded along two traverses in southern Western Australia. The survey locations were chosen so as to define conductivity structure in the deep crust and upper mantle across fundamental geological boundaries within and at the margin of the Yilgarn Craton.Data across the suture zone between the Archean Yilgarn Craton and the adjacent Proterozoic Albany-Fraser Orogen suggest major structures and crustal blocks have been successfully mapped based on their conductivity characteristics. The data are interpreted as showing the orogen is largely allochthonous and the suture zone may contain remanent oceanic crust and suspect terranes of continental affinity.Preliminary results from a survey across the southern Yilgarn Craton from the Southern Cross to Eastern Goldfields greenstone terrains suggest major fault structures, such as the Koolyanobbing shear zone, extend in to the deep crust and dip to the east. A zone of anomalously conductive mantle occurs beneath the Lake Johnston greenstone belt. This belt contains nickel sulphide deposits but the origin and significance of the mantle feature and any link to the mineralisation remains equivocal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207