Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA): TENDER 52-week data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients (N=112) 2–17 yrs with active sJIA for ≥6 mo and inadequate response to corticosteroids (CS) and NSAIDs were randomized 2:1 to TCZ (8 mg/kg if body weight ≥30 kg; 12 mg/kg if <30 kg) or placebo (control) every 2 wks for 12 wks in part 1; all patients received open-label TCZ at 8 or 12 mg/kg per body weight in part 2. Patients who escaped to open-label TCZ in part 1 also entered part 2. Oral CS tapering was permitted at wks 6 and 8 in part 1 and in the open-label extension in patients with ACR70 response, ESR <20 mm/h, and no fever. Efficacy data are presented for patients who had reached wk 52 of TCZ treatment by May 10, 2010 (n=88); safety data through May 10, 2010 are presented for all patients (n=112). Wk 52 baseline was the first TCZ dose; part 1 placebo patients were re-baselined when they escaped or entered part 2. Proportions of TCZ patients who achieved JIA ACR30 + absence of fever or JIA ACR70/90 progressively improved from wk 12 to wk 52 (Table). Number (mean±SD) of joints with active arthritis or with limited range of motion decreased from 19.8±15.7 and 19.8±15.6, respectively, at baseline to 3.0±7.0 and 7.5±11.7, respectively, at wk 52, with 45% of patients having 0 active joints. At baseline, 55% of patients (n=62) had fever (temperature ≥37.5°C in the preceding 14 days), while at wk 52 only 9% (n=8) had fever. From baseline to wk 52, improvement in the scores was: CHAQ-DI from 1.7±0.9 to 0.7±0.8; physician global assessment VAS from 64.9±22.3 to 9.7±12.8, and patient/parent global assessment VAS from 58.7±24.4 to 12.6±18.5. There was a marked reduction in CS dose from 0.30±0.20 mg/kg/d at baseline to 0.06±0.08 at wk 52, with 48% having discontinued CS. There were 33 serious AEs (SAEs) in 25 patients; 12 SAEs were considered related (remote, possible, or probable) to TCZ (SAE rate: 0.23/patient year [PY] in part 1, 0.25/PY in part 2). Among the 15 serious infections, 6 were considered related to TCZ; all resolved and none led to study discontinuation. Twelve patients withdrew: 4 because of AEs; 4 because of insufficient response, 3 withdrew consent or did not return, and 1 died of a suspected tension pneumothorax unrelated to treatment. Year 1 results from this first global phase 3 study demonstrate that TCZ is highly effective and generally well tolerated in patients with sJIA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".