MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238922788 · doi:10.14789/jmj.63.472

Abstracts for 2016 Annual Poster Presentation (Research Institute for Diseases of Old Age & Center for Genomic and Regenerative Medicine)

2017· article· en· W4238922788 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJuntendo Medical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)MedicineRegenerative medicineCenter (category theory)BiologySurgeryGeneticsChemistryStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hereditary deafness affects about 1 in 1,600 children and GJB2 gene mutation is most frequent cause for this disease. GJB2 encodes connexin26 (Cx26), a component in cochlear gap junction. Cx26 is mainly expressed in cochlear supporting cells and fibrocytes, and forms large gap junction plaque (GJP) macromolecular complex. Recently, we have developed a method for preparing inner ear precursor cells with Cx26GJP from mouse iPS cells (Fukunaga, Stem Cell Report, 2016). In this study, we aimed for separation of inner ear progenitor cells and mass culture of the cells by simplification of the method. Methods: The cochlear feeder cells were developed from adult cochlear tissue to support cochlear differentiation. Undifferrentiated mouse iPS cells were cultured in mediums which contain several reagent cocktails on the cochlear feeder cells. Cx26 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. GFP signals controlled by Nanog promotor (Nanog-GFP) were monitored as an undifferentiated state marker. To investigate the characterization of cochlear feeder cells, surface antigens were identified by flow cytometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJuntendo Medical JournalSame topicCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFrench-language works237,207