Retraction: shear contribution of basalt fiber reinforced polymers bars(BFRP) reinforced light weight concrete (FRLWC) (IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 740 012062)
Post-publication record
OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article has been retracted by IOP Publishing following an allegation that this article, including all images, have been taken from another source. IOP Publishing agrees the text and figures appear identical to [1]. IOP Publishing has made multiple attempts to contact the author for an explanation. As IOP Publishing has received no response or evidence to refute this allegation, IOP Publishing is retracting this article. If the authors wish to contest this retraction they are advised to contact researchintegrity@ioppublishing.org . 1. Abbadi, Abdulrahman 2018 Shear contribution of fiber-reinforced lightweight concrete (FRLWC) reinforced with basalt fiber reinforced Polymer (BFRP) bars MSc project, Universite Laval, Canada https://corpus.ulaval.ca/jspui/bitstream/20.500.11794/31848/1/34775.pdf . Retraction published: 25 October 2021
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.045 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".