Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2006), "List of Contributors", Balint, J., Philpott, S., Baker, R. and Strosberg, M. (Ed.) Ethics and Epidemics (Advances in Bioethics, Vol. 9), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(06)09012-1 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters List of Contributors Introduction to Ethics and Epidemics Chapter 1: The Statue of Security: Human Rights and Post-9/11 Epidemics Chapter 2: Quarantine and Civil Liberties Chapter 3: The 2003 SARS Outbreak in Canada: Legal and Ethical Lessons About the Use of Quarantine Chapter 4: Can Mandatory Vaccination of Health Care Professionals during an Influenza Pandemic ever be Justified? Chapter 5: Medical Ethics and Epidemics: A Historical Perspective Chapter 6: Physician Professionalism and Preparing for Epidemics: Challenges and Opportunities Chapter 7: Doctors, Duties, and Dangers: The Reasonable Physician and Contagious Populations Chapter 8: Ethically Justified Limits on the Obligations of Physicians and Health Care Organizations in Response to Epidemics and Bioterrorism Chapter 9: Ethics and Epidemics in the Developing World: The Case of AIDS in Africa: Treatment Challenges Chapter 10: Under What Conditions is Clinical Research in Developing Countries Exploitative? A Framework for Assessing Exploitation in Mutually Advantageous Transactions Chapter 11: A Winter's Tale: Bioethics Confronts Avian Flu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".