Impact of the radiative forcing on the winter North Atlantic-European atmospheric circulation 
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accelerated warming linked to climate change has become a topic of great interest due to its projected impact on ecosystems. In this work, we assess the causes and impacts of the anthropogenic radiative forcing on the North Atlantic-European atmospheric circulation in boreal winter (DJF). To isolate the response to radiative forcing, we have used two approaches, whose simulations follow the historical/scenario concentrations from CMIP6. The first approach consists of three 240-year simulations with the European Consortium – Earth System model version 3.3 (EC-EARTH v3.3) keeping fixed the radiative forcing at 1950, characterizing the Past climate, at 2000, representative of Present-day conditions, and at 2050, projecting the near-Future climate. The second approach makes use of the Large Ensemble (i.e. 24 members) of transient simulations performed with the Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace Coupled Model version 6 (IPSL-CM6), where three 10-year periods have been considered, namely 1949-1959, 1999-2009, and 2049-2059, assuming that the radiative forcing remains relatively constant in each of them. Results show that both approaches yield a consistent forced response, and that it scales linearly with radiative forcing, increasing in amplitude from Present-minus-Past to Future-minus-Present. At low latitudes, in the tropical Atlantic, the forced atmospheric response is characterized by a Gill-type baroclinic structure, where the anomalous anticyclonic circulation at upper levels reinforces the westerly wind at the equatorward flank of the North Atlantic jet. At high latitudes, the forced response is reminiscent of the ‘Arctic Amplification’ linked to sea-ice reduction, and the thermally-driven baroclinic structure can be seen over the Labrador Sea-Hudson Bay region. At mid-latitudes, the forced response shows a barotropic pattern, with a cyclonic (anticyclonic) circulation in the North Atlantic (Euro-Mediterranean) sector, pointing out a role for non-radiative, eddy-related effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".