Bibliographic record
Abstract
This special issue consists of contributions from some of the participants of the international workshop on "Recurrence of Great Interplate Earthquakes and its Mechanism", January 20-21, 1999, Kochi, Southwest Japan.The City of Kochi is situated in the forearc of the Nankai subduction zone, where great thrust earthquakes occur with a recurrence interval of about 100 years.The historical record of great earthquakes extends back to 684 AD, and the most recent events occurred in 1944 (Ms = 7.9) and 1946 (Ms = 8.0).The workshop was attended by over seventy participants from Japan, Canada, France, USA, and Taiwan.Forty oral or poster presentations were made in six sessions including "Plate motions and tectonic stresses", "Paleoseismology", "Observations closer to source region: Borehole and ocean bottom", "Fault zone properties", "Seismic coupling", and "Modeling".The workshop was highlighted by a public lecture to more than four hundred local residents and by a fieldtrip to the Muroto peninsula where features of crustal deformation associated with previous great subduction earthquakes were well preserved.The papers presented in this special issue covers a variety of subjects regarding subduction processes: forearc tectonics, role of splay faults, tomographic 3-D structure, coseismic slip distribution, elastic and viscoelastic modeling of interseismic deformation and earthquake cycles, and techniques of observing earthquake related crustal deformation.Most papers focus on the Nankai subduction zone and its North American analogue, the Cascadia subduction.Both subduction zones are characterized by the young age of the subduction plate and hence relatively high temperatures in the forearc and slab and along the subduction fault.They share other similarities in terms of subduction zone geometry, relative plate motion, maximum earthquake depth, crustal stresses, and accretionary wedge processes.It is our hope that this special issue will further promote comparative studies of these two subduction zones.We wish to thank all participants of the workshop for sharing their ideas and research results and the Association for the Development of Earthquake Prediction, Japan, for financially supporting the workshop and preparation of this volume.For various practical reasons, some of the papers initially
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.663 | 0.541 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".