Titrage infrarouge de l'acide phosphorique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The titration of phosphoric acid by sodium hydroxide was performed by infrared (IR) spectroscopy with the objective of obtaining the infrared spectra of the pure ionic species and determining their abundance as a function of pH. In the series of spectra, taken in the pH range of 0.18-13.4, the subtraction of neutral water, acidic water, and basic water was made. Factor analysis (FA) was then applied to the series of spectra to obtain the objective. First, we found the four most abundant species : H3PO4 (pH 0-4), H2PO-4 (pH 0-9), HPO4-2 (pH 4-14), and PO4-3 (pH 9-14). Secondly, we found three complexes in small quantities : H3PO4H2PO4(pH 0-4),H2PO4HPO24 (pH 4-9), and HPO24PO34 (pH 9-14). The equilibrium constants of these species with the parent molecules are 0.65, 0.63, and 0.4 L/mol, respectively. Thirdly, we found residual water that was closely bound to the ionic species which formed hydrates. The pKa values obtained from the IR titration were used to obtain the theoretical concentration of the four principal species as a function of pH. The resulting distribution curve was found to be coincident with the distribution curve obtained by IR.Key words : infrared spectroscopy, FT-IR, aqueous solutions, factor analysis, titration, phosphoric acid, pH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".