MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4239514472 · doi:10.7763/ijmlc.2015.v5.542

An Improved Histogram-Based Features in Low-Frequency DCT Domain for Face Recognition

2015· article· en· W4239514472 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Qiu, Koji Kotani, Feifei Lee, Tadahiro Ohmi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Computing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Systems and Laser Technology
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDiscrete cosine transformHistogramArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Facial recognition systemFace (sociological concept)Computer visionDomain (mathematical analysis)Frequency domainSpeech recognitionImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previously, we proposed an efficient algorithm for facial image recognition combined with vector quantization (VQ) histogram and energy histogram in low-frequency DCT domains. The former algorithm is essential for utilizing the phase information of DCT coefficients by applying binary vector quantization (BVQ) on DCT coefficient blocks. The latter algorithm, energy histogram can be considered to add magnitude information of DCT coefficients. These two histograms, which contain both phase and magnitude information of a DCT transformed facial image, are utilized as a very effective personal feature. In this paper, we propose a novel quantization optimization method for energy histogram according to the maximum entropy principle (MEP) as a design criterion. Publicly available AT&T database is used for the evaluation of our proposed algorithm, which is consisted of 40 subjects with 10 images per subject containing variations in lighting, posing, and expressions. It is demonstrated that face recognition using optimized energy histogram by maximization of information-theoretic entropy can achieve much higher recognition rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Machine Learning and ComputingSame topicOptical Systems and Laser TechnologyFrench-language works237,207