Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2016), "List of Contributors", Uncertainty and Strategic Decision Making (New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. vii-viii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2397-52102016027 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Peter Altmann Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden Karl S.J. Anderson National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland Julia Balogun University of Liverpool Management School, UK Ottilia Berze University of Victoria, Canada Daniela P. Blettner Simon Fraser University, Canada Ioanna D. Constantiou Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Robert J. Galavan National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland Daniel Geiger The University of Hamburg, Germany Gerard P. Hodgkinson University of Warwick, UK Anne Sigismund Huff National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland Tatjana V. Kazakova Horvàth & Partners Management Consultants, Germany Gerardus J. M. Lucas Simon Fraser University, Canada Richard T. Marcy University of Victoria, Canada Marius T. H. Meeus Tilburg University, The Netherlands Frances J. Milliken New York University, USA Kevin W. Rockmann George Mason University, USA Arisa Shollo Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Alesia Slocum Saint Louis University, Spain David M. Sluss Georgia Institute of Technology, USA Kristian J. Sund Roskilde University, Denmark Morten Thanning Vendelø Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Marius H. M. Zijlmans Deloitte Accountants, The Netherlands Book Chapters Uncertainty and Strategic Decision Making New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Uncertainty and Strategic Decision Making Copyright Page List of Contributors Foreword Introducing New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition A Conversation on Uncertainty in Managerial and Organizational Cognition When Shared Frames Become Contested: Environmental Dynamism and Capability (Re)Configuration as a Trigger of Organizational Framing Contests How Recursive Dialogue Frames and Reframes Technological Change The “how” of Multiple Leader Sensegiving and Strategic Change A Test of Perceptual Accuracy and Overconfidence in a Strategic Issue Context The Complexity of Simple Rules in Strategic Decision Making: Toward an Understanding of Organizational Heuristics Making Space for Intuition in Decision-Making: The Case of Project Prioritization The Effect of Organizational Performance Feedback on Team Attention Focus Public Sector Leaders as Early Detectors of Crises: The Role of Mental Models, Expertise and Development Author Biographies Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.076 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".